Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/14] kcov: fix INIT_TRACK race in kcov_dataflow

Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:00:07 +0200

Newsgroups	org.kernel.vger.workflows,dev.linux.lists.llvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID	<CAG_fn=XB7_zbjGzpgwEzm5dqcwehqvB+=SpJhHvw9QdETberAg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 9:25 AM Yunseong Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 6:21 PM Yunseong Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip...]
> >> Reported-by: sashiko-bot <[email protected]>
> >> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603-kcov-dataflow-next-20260603-v2-0-fee0939de2c4%40est.tech
> >> Signed-off-by: Yunseong Kim <[email protected]>
> >
> > Can we please avoid this?
> > kcov_dataflow.c is being introduced in the same series, there is no
> > need to send a buggy commit and a follow-up fix - just squash the two
> > together and note the changes after Signed-off-by: separated by a
> > triple dash.
>
> Thank you for your guide. I'll remove it in the next patch set.
Also please make sure to update the patch version. It's really hard to
distinguish between "[RFC PATCH v2 n/6]" and "[RFC PATCH v2 m/14]"
when both series pop up in the inbox.