Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dev-tools: scripts/container prefers Podman
Coiby Xu <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Jun 2026 18:05:32 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ajz8qtGkafGZnCPv@Rk> |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 11:02:49PM +0200, Guillaume Tucker wrote: >Hi Coiby, Hi Guillaume, > >On 24/06/2026 03:38, Coiby Xu wrote: >> Obviously scripts/container prefers Podman over Docker. Putting podman >> before docker also makes it consistent with following parts of the doc >> and the help text of the tool. >> >> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <[email protected]> >> --- >> Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst >> index 452415b64662..9e23f79d5ae1 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst >> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Available options: >> >> ``-r, --runtime RUNTIME`` >> >> - Container runtime name. Supported runtimes: ``docker``, ``podman``. >> + Container runtime name. Supported runtimes: ``podman``, ``docker``. >> >> If not specified, the first one found on the system will be used >> i.e. Podman if present, otherwise Docker. >> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ working directory and adjust the user and group id as needed. >> >> The container image which would typically include a compiler toolchain is >> provided by the user and selected via the ``-i`` option. The container runtime >> -can be selected with the ``-r`` option, which can be either ``docker`` or >> -``podman``. If none is specified, the first one found on the system will be >> +can be selected with the ``-r`` option, which can be either ``podman`` or >> +``docker``. If none is specified, the first one found on the system will be >> used while giving priority to Podman. Support for other runtimes may be added >> later depending on their popularity among users. >> > >It's a very subtle tweak but it does help avoid some confusion. > >Reviewed-by: Guillaume Tucker <[email protected]> Thanks for taking time to reviewing the patch! > >Thanks, >Guillaume > -- Best regards, Coiby