Re: [PATCH RFC] coding-assistants: simplify attribution
Mark Brown <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Jul 2026 17:08:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 05:54:48PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > And it reamins unclear to me what exactly we do get out of this detailed > information: Do we want to run statistical analysis on what agent and > model is used the most and publish that on LWN at some point? IIRC it was literally this, have people mention which tools they used so we can use that to inform our assessment of the patches. I'm not sure the differences we're actually seeing are tool based rather than operator skill though.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmpFO2YACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AqhAf/QMn6VvVhqzbxSsM4WdYRZ8E7RIGxyrLwcQd4khr7b4SqovCteJPEGlu8 qLH0WiQW8QF6+X6nBXDYu2qJ0ZpSY2dq1nh/HWAsI9Pt0mK7QEwd1TmqroiV2C9r d5iIKcvNex/ZVwRN5ZWF6O1wp5jVX56HxkuJCq4ROcdZtUzXsU0mFUiVcYYKv2Oq zbr/smkLE5LErwP7+fvsU+RF2p2765jZdYgL9wm+SMg+9sEkFNcieeTPn+XwgkoS xfb1MfTX/IO+Ht58Ns73GFHbyMhJ5GSeVIiGLBhUCiWRnnFTDfoWZtskHWZDWi3L IuhwMTwuZGlBQITvHzo7MW1uBEgX2A== =yWSO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----