Re: [PATCH RFC] coding-assistants: simplify attribution

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 12:35:21 +0100

Newsgroups	org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 09:10:16AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On 2026-07-01 17:08 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 05:54:48PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:

> > > And it reamins unclear to me what exactly we do get out of this detailed
> > > information: Do we want to run statistical analysis on what agent and
> > > model is used the most and publish that on LWN at some point?

> > IIRC it was literally this, have people mention which tools they used so
> > we can use that to inform our assessment of the patches.  I'm not sure

> Forgive my candor but I think that is just useless for us. It's
> certainly useful for AI company statistics. If we want to provide that
> service I would recommend we start charging. ;)

Yeah, that was more an observation of fact than a comment on value.
Certainly now we're able to see what things look like in practice.

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)