Re: [PATCH RFC] coding-assistants: simplify attribution
Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:41:40 +0300
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Finland |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 02 Jul 2026, Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> wrote: > "Say how much of your patch is LLM written, here are some examples". I think the question is, did you offload understanding to the LLM, or just the creation of the patch. I think Assisted-by gets used as an indication of "the contributor might not understand the contribution", and the patch might warrant extra scrutiny. But that's not reliable by any means. Right or wrong, it used to be that the lack of polish in a patch was used as a poor proxy for that, but now we get polished patches from LLMs. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel