Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/mm: test kmemleak's N-consecutive-scan leak confirmation
Breno Leitao <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jul 2026 10:11:42 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 08:43:27AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 03:55:52PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > I will spin this "fix" separated (CCing stable), and send a v2 for this > selftest with priming enabled. Quick update on this plan. The v2 for this patch depends on checksum fix[0], given it touches a similar code: @@ -687,6 +692,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *__alloc_object(gfp_t gfp) atomic_set(&object->use_count, 1); object->excess_ref = 0; object->count = 0; + object->unref_scans = 0; object->checksum = ~0; <-- Adde by the fix [0] I will wait the "Fix" to land first, before sending v2, avoiding merge conflicts and being able to rely on sashiko to review it (instead of having merging issues) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [0]