Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

>>
>> That tag is it stands is pretty useless, really.
> 
> Not to go over it all again but I disagree, even as it stands, it allows us to
> engage in conversation about the LLM usage if admitted, and to point those who
> are misbehaving at the rules if not.

Just to comment on that

When I don't see the tag I am clueless *if and how* LLMs were used, in
particular as some subsystems seem to encourage not using them and we even
document it as a "rather nice to have" -- "should".

And if I see the tag, I am clueless *how* LLMs were used.

So I see your point that the tag as it stands helps a little bit, for my
day-to-day work, however, not much, as I really care about the "how". :(

-- 
Cheers,

David