Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 05:18:03PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I haven't heard anyone involved in this mail thread objecting to the
> concepts you translated into sentences below, so I think it's worth a
> try. Of course there may be objections from people who are not aware of
> this very conversation.

To risk repeating myself - why does it all have to be in one?

Send the non-controversial bit, get that merged so it's there, then follow it up
with this. Simple no? :)

Sending this, getting it rejected, then having people's backs up because they'll
tie the two things together seems the less politically astute move.

Thanks, Lorenzo