Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

Christian Brauner <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:08:51 +0200
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <20260722-haarausfall-giftschlange-klotz-820f0391533e@brauner>
On 2026-07-07 13:03 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Christian Brauner <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> >> Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since
> >> everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include
> >> how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch.
> >
> > https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
> 
> I still have it around :)  I can apply it if that's truly the
> consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the
> conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review
> things.

I read the article. :) Feel free to massage the commit message to
whatever seems right and resubmit.