Re: [PATCH] coding-assistants: simplify attribution

"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/4/26 10:10, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 02:34:40PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>> -  Assisted-by: Claude:claude-3-opus coccinelle sparse
>>> +  Assisted-by: LLM coccinelle sparse
>>
>> I've been playing with this a bit, and it's pretty easy to teach the agent to
>> add a few tag-like notes as to how exactly it was used, e.g.:
>>
>>     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/b4/b4.git/commit/?id=018b87444d32eb2ffee7cb25f0785e54aa35f7bf
>>
>> This has:
>>
>> | Assisted-by: LLM [design, codegen, tests]
>>
>> It tells us a bit more about *how* the LLM was used, without introducing the
>> advertisement or pinning exact models.
>>
>> This format should allow for multiple tool usage:
>>
>> | Assisted-by: LLM [triage, tests], coccinelle
>>
>> I don't suggest this is included in this version, but it *is* fairly
>> straightforward to add to AGENTS.md and tells reviewers just how exactly the
>> LLM was used.
> 
> I think perhaps this should be a follow-up (this stuff is so fraught that I am
> super-glad to see Christian's suggestion fly through and want to take gains
> iteratively on this :), but completely agree.
> 
> David suggested something like:
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM # < what it actually did in the patch >
> 
> So I think we're kinda aligned on that?

Once the patch from Christian is upstream I can follow up with some
changes. I was holding that back for now until there is agreement on
the LLM part.

-- 
Cheers,

David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.