Re: [xdp-hints] Re: XDP Redirect and TX Metadata
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:23:37 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.xdp-newbies,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 14/01/2025 19.07, Florian Kauer wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > On 1/14/25 17:47, Marcus Wichelmann wrote: >> Am 12.02.24 um 15:35 schrieb Florian Kauer: >>> On 12.02.24 14:41, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >>>> Florian Kauer <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>>> 2. For the RX side, the metadata is documented as "XDP RX Metadata" >>>>> (https://docs.kernel.org/networking/xdp-rx-metadata.html), while for >>>>> TX it is "AF_XDP TX Metadata" >>>>> (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/networking/xsk-tx-metadata.html). >>>>> That seems to imply that TX metadata only works for AF_XDP, but not >>>>> for direct redirection. Is there a reason for that? >>>> >>>> Well, IIRC, AF_XDP was the most pressing use case, and no one has gotten >>>> around to extending this to the regular XDP forwarding path yet. >>> >>> Ok, that is fine. I had the fear that there is some fundamental problem >>> that prevents to implement this. >> >> Hi, >> are there any updates on this? I'm currently looking into this as well. > > I am still interested, but have no implementation planned short- or mid-term. > So, looking forward to your implementation :-) > > Greetings, > Florian > >> >> I'd like to have a way to enable the TX checksum offload when redirecting from >> one device to another. >> Stanislav Fomichev already implemented [1] the TX offload support for the AF_XDP >> use case (thanks for that), but for now, this cannot be used for "regular" >> redirects. >> >> I'm currently in a position where I can invest some work into this, but figured >> it would make sense to ask you first: >> >> Do you already have concrete plans or ideas in mind, how the API to trigger the >> TX offloads should look like? >> I have seen the talk [2] from Jesper about this, but I'm not sure if the >> proposals in there are still up to date. My talk is outdated. My co-workers Arthur and Jakub did a presentation[3] at LPC2024. Alexei liked the Compressed Key-Value store idea from that presentation[3]. So, we are currently working on a Compressed Key-Value store that Arthur named "traits". We are almost done benchmarking this, see traits0N_* documents in [4]. [3] https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1935/ [4] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/main/areas/hints/ Our implementation is primarily focused on the RX side, and transferring RX hardware metadata to CPUMAP+veth when doing XDP_REDIRECT. You ask is about TX side, right? >> I think it could be possible to introduce a program flag, just like >> `BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS`, and if this flag is set, interpret a part of the >> metadata area as a `struct xsk_tx_metadata`. Then, the code to apply the >> offloads from that struct when xmit-ing the frame could be reused, as it >> is already implemented in `mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame` for example. >> But the "xsk" in the struct name may be a bit confusing. :/ >> >> Do you think this could work or could you guide me into a direction that may >> have a chance to be upstreamable? Also, is there any recent work on this that >> I should know off? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Marcus Wichelmann >> Hetzner Cloud GmbH >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ >> [2] https://lpc.events/event/16/contributions/1362/attachments/1056/2017/xdp-hints-lpc2022.pdf >> >