Re: Wouldn't Zig be more suitable than rust? In the Linux kernel
Joshua Rose <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:11:46 +1000
| Newsgroups | org.kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <phlydl3vwyfnhwit7ibq7lwxjg4ol3zsma7wlnbug65ec2ewl2@phj5mra62742> |
> The Zig compiler is compatible with C So is Rust. > Zig code is cleaner than Rust, The standard library is a bit more readable, sure, but the overall 'cleanliness' of either language is up for debate. > and they are both equally secure. If by 'secure' you mean safer, I believe Rust outshines Zig in memory safety. Again, this is just from my research; I have only ever experimented with Rust so I may be a bit biased. -- - Joshua. _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies