Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] mm/mglru: improve readability of isolate_folios()
Baolin Wang <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:33:44 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kvack.linux-mm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/3/26 12:46 PM, Barry Song wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 11:22 AM Baolin Wang > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7/31/26 4:38 PM, Barry Song (Xiaomi) wrote: >>> From: Ridong Chen <[email protected]> >>> >>> The for_each_evictable_type() loop in isolate_folios() >>> is misleading: it does not actually iterate over each >>> evictable type. Instead, get_type_to_scan() selects the >>> type to scan, while the iterator `i` merely bounds the >>> number of attempts. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <[email protected]> >>> Co-developed-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <[email protected]> >>> --- >> >> Good cleanup. Some comments below. >> >>> mm/vmscan.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c >>> index 31947fa60f18..0038f33aa318 100644 >>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c >>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c >>> @@ -4828,35 +4828,42 @@ static int get_type_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness) >>> return positive_ctrl_err(&sp, &pv); >>> } >>> >>> +static inline bool is_single_type_reclaim(int swappiness) >>> +{ >>> + return swappiness == MIN_SWAPPINESS || >>> + swappiness == SWAPPINESS_ANON_ONLY; >>> +} >>> + >>> static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec, >>> struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness, >>> struct list_head *list, int *isolated, >>> int *isolate_type, int *isolate_scanned) >>> { >>> - int i; >>> - int total_scanned = 0; >>> + bool single_type = is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness); >>> int type = get_type_to_scan(lruvec, swappiness); >>> + int total_scanned = 0, scanned, tier; >>> + bool tried = false; >> >> The tried' is a bit confusing. How about 'type_fallback_allowed'? Or >> other more readable variable name? >> >> In addition, the 'single_type' variable can be removed, and just >> initialize 'type_fallback_allowed' directly: >> >> bool type_fallback_allowed = !is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness); > > > Yep. It seems we can simply use type_fallback_allowed and drop > tried entirely: Thanks. That's what I meant:) > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 1ffd96c87bc2..358388b49a70 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -4840,10 +4840,9 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long > nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec, > struct list_head *list, int *isolated, > int *isolate_type, int *isolate_scanned) > { > - bool single_type = is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness); > + bool type_fallback_allowed = !is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness); > int type = get_type_to_scan(lruvec, swappiness); > int total_scanned = 0, scanned, tier; > - bool tried = false; > > retry: > tier = get_tier_idx(lruvec, type); > @@ -4861,9 +4860,9 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long > nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec, > * We are running out of the current reclaim type. Fall back to > * the other type if allowed. > */ > - if (!tried && !scanned && !single_type) { > + if (type_fallback_allowed && !scanned) { > type = !type; > - tried = true; > + type_fallback_allowed = false; > goto retry; > }