[PATCH 1/1] mm/ksm: avoid missing ksmd wakeups in ksm_enter
Longlong Xia <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 23:21:15 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kvack.linux-mm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Longlong Xia <[email protected]> __ksm_enter() decides whether ksmd needs a wakeup by checking if the mm slot list is empty before inserting the new slot. The empty check is currently outside ksm_mmlist_lock. Another CPU can remove the last slot and let ksmd go back to sleep after the unlocked check, while this CPU inserts a new slot and skips the wakeup based on the stale result. Take ksm_mmlist_lock before checking the list so the empty-to-nonempty transition and the insertion are observed as one critical section. Fixes: 6e15838425ac ("ksm: keep quiet while list empty") Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <[email protected]> --- mm/ksm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c index 7d5b76478f0b..3f2f4707ca9e 100644 --- a/mm/ksm.c +++ b/mm/ksm.c @@ -3019,7 +3019,7 @@ int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm) { struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot; struct mm_slot *slot; - int needs_wakeup; + bool needs_wakeup; mm_slot = mm_slot_alloc(mm_slot_cache); if (!mm_slot) @@ -3027,10 +3027,9 @@ int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm) slot = &mm_slot->slot; + spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock); /* Check ksm_run too? Would need tighter locking */ needs_wakeup = list_empty(&ksm_mm_head.slot.mm_node); - - spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock); mm_slot_insert(mm_slots_hash, mm, slot); /* * When KSM_RUN_MERGE (or KSM_RUN_STOP), -- 2.43.0