Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: fail the fault on a malformed swap entry instead of retrying it

"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kvack.linux-mm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/12/26 12:59, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 09:26:51AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> do_swap_page() returns 0 when get_swap_device() fails, which the fault
>> handler reads as "handled". For an entry that can never become valid
>> the retry takes the same fault again, so the thread spins until it is
>> killed.
>>
>> Return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS for a malformed entry, as the sibling arm
>> already does for an unrecognised non-swap entry. A NULL return still
>> means swapoff, which is still worth retrying.
> 
> What kind of SIGBUS do you get from this? as in the si_code. Out of all
> the options
> 
> #define BUS_ADRALN	1	/* invalid address alignment */
> #define BUS_ADRERR	2	/* non-existent physical address */
> #define BUS_OBJERR	3	/* object specific hardware error */
> /* hardware memory error consumed on a machine check: action required */
> #define BUS_MCEERR_AR	4
> /* hardware memory error detected in process but not consumed: action optional*/
> #define BUS_MCEERR_AO	5
> 
> I would say this would fit none of them. The default (AFAICT) would be
> BUS_ADRERR, and I think that one is quite overloaded with meaning (namely,
> with regards to memory-mapped IO past EOF, or EIO on file IO). I wouldn't
> love to also use it for this, IMO.

Note that what is discussed here that should usually happen unless kernel bug.
So I don't think we have to worry about the details here, really.

It's similar to the VM_FAULT_SIGBUS handling earlier in the function after the
print_bad_pte().

-- 
Cheers,

David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.