[PATCH v2] mm/oom_kill: simplify remaining RCU sections with scoped_guard(rcu)

Ye Liu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kvack.linux-mm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Ye Liu <[email protected]>

Replace the remaining manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs
in oom_cpuset_eligible(), select_bad_process(), dump_tasks(),
task_will_free_mem(), and __oom_kill_process() with scoped_guard(rcu)
for consistency and simpler control flow.  scoped_guard(rcu) limits
the RCU critical section to the loop body rather than the entire
remaining function scope, making the protected region explicit and
safer for future changes.

Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <[email protected]>
---
v2:
 - Use scoped_guard instead of guard.
 - Link:https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

 mm/oom_kill.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 5f372f6e26fa..0e8982e5be51 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -94,27 +94,27 @@ static bool oom_cpuset_eligible(struct task_struct *start,
 	bool ret = false;
 	const nodemask_t *mask = oc->nodemask;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_thread(start, tsk) {
-		if (mask) {
-			/*
-			 * If this is a mempolicy constrained oom, tsk's
-			 * cpuset is irrelevant.  Only return true if its
-			 * mempolicy intersects current, otherwise it may be
-			 * needlessly killed.
-			 */
-			ret = mempolicy_in_oom_domain(tsk, mask);
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * This is not a mempolicy constrained oom, so only
-			 * check the mems of tsk's cpuset.
-			 */
-			ret = cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(current, tsk);
+	scoped_guard(rcu) {
+		for_each_thread(start, tsk) {
+			if (mask) {
+				/*
+				 * If this is a mempolicy constrained oom, tsk's
+				 * cpuset is irrelevant.  Only return true if its
+				 * mempolicy intersects current, otherwise it may be
+				 * needlessly killed.
+				 */
+				ret = mempolicy_in_oom_domain(tsk, mask);
+			} else {
+				/*
+				 * This is not a mempolicy constrained oom, so only
+				 * check the mems of tsk's cpuset.
+				 */
+				ret = cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(current, tsk);
+			}
+			if (ret)
+				break;
 		}
-		if (ret)
-			break;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -368,11 +368,11 @@ static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc)
 	else {
 		struct task_struct *p;
 
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		for_each_process(p)
-			if (oom_evaluate_task(p, oc))
-				break;
-		rcu_read_unlock();
+		scoped_guard(rcu) {
+			for_each_process(p)
+				if (oom_evaluate_task(p, oc))
+					break;
+		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -430,14 +430,14 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct oom_control *oc)
 		struct task_struct *p;
 		int i = 0;
 
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		for_each_process(p) {
-			/* Avoid potential softlockup warning */
-			if ((++i & 1023) == 0)
-				touch_softlockup_watchdog();
-			dump_task(p, oc);
+		scoped_guard(rcu) {
+			for_each_process(p) {
+				/* Avoid potential softlockup warning */
+				if ((++i & 1023) == 0)
+					touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+				dump_task(p, oc);
+			}
 		}
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 }
 
@@ -894,17 +894,17 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
 	 * are dying as well to make sure that a) nobody pins its mm and
 	 * b) the task is also reapable by the oom reaper.
 	 */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_process(p) {
-		if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
-			continue;
-		if (same_thread_group(task, p))
-			continue;
-		ret = __task_will_free_mem(p);
-		if (!ret)
-			break;
+	scoped_guard(rcu) {
+		for_each_process(p) {
+			if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
+				continue;
+			if (same_thread_group(task, p))
+				continue;
+			ret = __task_will_free_mem(p);
+			if (!ret)
+				break;
+		}
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -960,29 +960,29 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim, const char *message)
 	 * That thread will now get access to memory reserves since it has a
 	 * pending fatal signal.
 	 */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_process(p) {
-		if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
-			continue;
-		if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
-			continue;
-		if (is_global_init(p)) {
-			can_oom_reap = false;
-			mm_flags_set(MMF_OOM_SKIP, mm);
-			pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm pinned by %d (%s)\n",
-					task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm,
-					task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
-			continue;
+	scoped_guard(rcu) {
+		for_each_process(p) {
+			if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
+				continue;
+			if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
+				continue;
+			if (is_global_init(p)) {
+				can_oom_reap = false;
+				mm_flags_set(MMF_OOM_SKIP, mm);
+				pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm pinned by %d (%s)\n",
+						task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm,
+						task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
+				continue;
+			}
+			/*
+			 * No kthread_use_mm() user needs to read from the userspace so
+			 * we are ok to reap it.
+			 */
+			if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+				continue;
+			do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
 		}
-		/*
-		 * No kthread_use_mm() user needs to read from the userspace so
-		 * we are ok to reap it.
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
-			continue;
-		do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	if (can_oom_reap)
 		queue_oom_reaper(victim);
-- 
2.25.1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.