Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type

On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 01:26:57PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hey, do not get me wrong. I very much care about reviewers as well. I
> merely wanted to say that we've had peaks of tool driven patches no
> matter what. Things have eventually normalized but people need to be
> educated about expectations of maintainers. Sashiko suggesting "but this
> might need attention as well..." certainly contribute to more noise but
> keep in mind that AI driven people are going to find a tool of their
> choice to arm them with ideas to implement and post so focusing on
> Sashiko is not going to help all that much. My main message is to
> establish and enforce a notion that patches are going to be ignored if
> they are not justified properly (even if they might seem technically
> correct or fixing a theoretical problem).

I couldn't agree more.

We are, of course, furiously agreeing here :>)

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

--
Cheers, Lorenzo