Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type

John Hubbard <[email protected]> writes:

> On 8/21/26 2:35 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>> "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]> writes:
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> ...>> We already had _too much work_ prior to the slopgeddon. Now we have a multiple
>>> of that.
>>>
>>> Roman - I really think we a way of switching off the 'unrelated to your patch
>>> but' stuff per-subsystem would be useful.
>> 
>> I thought about it, but switching it off completely looks dubious to
>> me. So maybe moderating it a bit can help? Like not reporting completely
>> unrelated issues or at least do not report them more than once?
>
> Or, reporting them *once*, and not as a reply to the patch! 
>
> After all, it's "unrelated to your patch". So then, don't pollute that
> patch's review thread, right?
>
> That would alleviate the most infuriating part of this cycle, imho.

Yes, this sounds good to me, it requires quite some work on the sashiko
side, so I can't promise it tomorrow, but hopefully in few weeks.

Thanks