Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust_binder: check ownership before using vma

Artem Lytkin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kvack.linux-mm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2026, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> The plan is to introduce more vma
> abstractions to avoid this unsafe access to vm_ops and vm_private_data,
> but for now let's start with the simplest possible fix.
[...]
> (We probably still want to do both, but
> the vm_ops->close callback will be added later as part of the follow-up
> vma API changes.)

Alice, is that follow-up still on your list, or would you rather someone
else took it?

I'd like to add the missing pieces to kernel::mm::virt: a VmOperations
trait with open, close and fault, a typed way to install it together
with the private data on a VmaNew, a VmFault wrapper, and a PFN-map
typestate next to VmaMixedMap with vmf_insert_pfn_prot() on it. Binder
would then drop BINDER_VM_OPS and the raw vm_ops pointer compare and get
a close callback like the C driver has. Tyr needs the fault and PFN-map
half of that for its user MMIO mmap. The first two patches of
Collabora's Tyr series are the pgprot_noncached and pgoff helpers; they
have had no replies since 7 May, so I'd build on those rather than
duplicate them:

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

One design question first, for you and Lorenzo. f_op->mmap is
deprecated in favour of mmap_prepare, where a driver sets desc->vm_ops
instead of touching the vma, and the Rust side only has the old mmap
path today. Should the vm_ops abstraction be built around mmap_prepare
from the start, with a Rust mmap_prepare hook for miscdevice next to
it, or is landing it on the existing VmaNew an acceptable first step?

Artem
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.