Re: Hashing out the scope of work

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:

> I believe we had explicitly agreed in a previous CTI TAC meeting to start over
> with a clean slate for patchwork and not bother with migrating the previous
> database.

Bug database migration is definitely a lot more important than patchwork 
migration, but I think the starting point is that patchwork state should 
be migrated in the absence of a clear reason that's problematic.  And if 
it's problematic, we should try to understand if there's a better way to 
configure the future patchwork installation to make it more susceptible to 
any future migrations.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
[email protected]