Re: CTI TAC Meeting Notes 2024-09-25
Carlos O'Donell <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:43:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.cti-tac |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/25/24 12:10 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 12:04:17PM GMT, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> * David: Have we heard back from LF IT? > > Hi, all: > > Apologies for not attending -- I've not seen any invites, so assumed our > presence is not required. No need to apolgize, we discussed with Adrianne Marcum (OpenSSF) :-) You're not on the CTI TAC meeting invite because we don't normally need LF IT to attend each meeting. The only outstanding question I have is around the OpenShift and RHEL costs in the SOW and if we can negotiate with IBM and Red Hat about those costs. I've sent you distinct emails about that, but haven't heard back from you on that. I think this is something we should pursue? > To my knowledge, there are no outstanding items for LF IT. We have done some > initial cost analysis for openshift and cloud deployments for the SOW, but no > further work has been done since then, since my understanding is that there > isn't sufficient "buy-in" from the glibc community to proceed with any service > deployments at this time. Please feel free to correct me if that understanding > is incorrect. Correct, I'm going to proceed on getting the additional "buy-in" from the parties. I think that to get that "buy-in" we might have to add some text to the SOW and sponsorship agreements, but I'm going to collect all of the possible niggles and hand them to the TAC to review in one block. They include things like making sure that LF IT has time each year to review software usage against requirements, which includes a FOSS review. I don't want the SOW to change right now, but I'll collect any amendments and review with the TAC before they go to you. -- Cheers, Carlos.