CTI TAC Meeting Notes 2025-05-28

Carlos O'Donell <[email protected]> Wed, 28 May 2025 15:59:27 -0400
Newsgroups org.linuxfoundation.lists.cti-tac
Organization Red Hat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
​CTI TAC Meeting Notes 2025-05-28

Present:
  * Carlos O'Donell
  * Joseph Myers
  * Kris Borchers (OpenSSF)
  * Siddhesh Poyarekar
  * David Edelsohn
       
Agenda:
  * [codonell] Both SSDLC docs are posted live.
   * Developers asked why not just use a forge? (Comments from Andrew Pinksi)
   * co: This doesn't solve all the problems around hosting and supporting it.
   * de: Does the forge meeting the project requirements?
   * co: No.
  * [codonell] Analysis of Sourceware security checklist.
   * https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/SSDLC/Policy/Sourceware
  * [codonell] Noted that we discussed with Kris the meeting with OpenSSF GM. And wanted to have more than one agenda item for a meeting with Steve.
   * [kris] Maximizing the value of that meeting would be ideal.
  * [codonell] Presented to the OpenSSF TAC on our progress.
   * https://github.com/ossf/tac/pull/488 (CY25Q2 status update)
  * [siddhesh] It is hard to gather consensus since developers don't want to get involved in a complex conversation.
  * [siddhesh] With the SSDLC docs, we have restarted the conversation.
  * [codonell] Getting support from specific core developers is important.
  * [david] Expanding this conversation beyond the core leadership runs into problems.
  * [codonell] Do I need to get all the glibc stewards to respond publicly?
  * [david] Is this different from the DCO change?
  * [siddhesh] Should we extend this conversation to include Sourceware? How do we extend the conversation to support the security of the projects.
Next steps:
  * Carlos to post direct questions to current Sourceware progress.
  * Carlos to update the CTI website with current progress.
  * Sid to still review OpenSSF best practices badge gold and silver for hardware requirements.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.