Re: First draft analysis of services used by glibc.
Carlos O'Donell <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:44:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.cti-tac |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/6/22 14:13, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2022, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> * Pipermail archives: >> * https://sourceware.org/pipermail/* >> * e.g. https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/ >> * public-inbox archives: >> * https://inbox.sourceware.org/* >> * e.g. https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/ >> * Not all inboxes work correctly e.g. glibc-bugs-regex doesn't work. > > Also the older MHonArc archives (/legacy-ml/) - no longer updated, but the > /legacy-ml/ URLs and /ml/ redirects to them need to keep working. > > E.g. https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-alpha/2020-01/ Oh! Good point. Yes. One would hope that with public-inbox we might be able to get a unified new URL scheme that includes all the old list archive data merged into the new archive data and all of it searchable. -- Cheers, Carlos.