Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 2/3] Maintainer Handbook: Maintainer Entry Profile
Dan Williams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.ksummit-discuss,dev.linux.lists.ksummit,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,org.01.lists.linux-nvdimm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPcyv4ihn9kgO-VDOK=Jyj8RrG2RVXUvu8Y66zR7JYZm9-rWPA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:13 PM Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Dan, > > A month or so ago I wrote... > > > > See Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst for more details, > > > and a follow-on example profile for the libnvdimm subsystem. > > > > Thus far, the maintainer guide is focused on how to *be* a maintainer. > > This document, instead, is more about how to deal with specific > > maintainers. So I suspect that Documentation/maintainer might be the > > wrong place for it. > > > > Should we maybe place it instead under Documentation/process, or even > > create a new top-level "book" for this information? > > Unless I missed it, I've not heard back from you on this. I'd like to get > this stuff pulled in for 5.5 if possible... would you object if I were to > apply your patches, then tack on a move over to the process guide? Sorry for the delay. Yes, the process book is a better location now that this information is focused on being supplemental guidelines for submitters rather than a "how to maintain X subsystem" guide. I do want to respin this without the Coding Style addendum to address the specific feedback there, but other than that I'm happy to see this move forward. _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss