Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation
Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:05:54 +0300
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.ksummit-discuss,dev.linux.lists.ksummit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Shuah, On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:08:36AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 6/12/20 3:07 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:28:09AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >> On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 12:03 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > >>> People that know the sub-systems well might not > >>> have time to document and more importantly keeping the documents > >>> updated. > >> > >> So you somehow expect people that do _not_ know the > >> sub-system well to produce good and useful documentation? > > > > Writing documentation is a way to learn. > > +1 > > I find it useful and I also use it as learning tool. When I attempt > document or explain a concept or an area, I get a deeper understanding > of that area. I only partly agree with that. I started the DRM documentation effort because I had to write a driver, and there was no documentation. Writing doc was indeed a way to learn, but it's a really high barrier to entry, more difficult than "just" writing a new driver. You need a very high level of motivation to do so, I don't think it's a suitable for someone who has little technical knowledge of the Linux kernel for instance. It also requires lots of time. > > Besides, to produce good and usefull documentation it is not necessary > > to have very deep understanding of all the small details. The writer > > must capture the large picture and be able to explain it. > > +1. > > I would counter the argument that new developers can't document an area, > they can and the document can be reviewed by experts. > > A fresh set of eyes bring a new perspective and could help improve the > code, just like the benefits of having others test your code. A fresh set of eyes can point to inconsistencies in the code while writing documentation, but I don't share the view that we can consider documentation writing as a good learning curve task in general, it really requires lots of time and a strong incentive in addition to documentation writing itself. > I have had some level of success adding documentation tasks in the > mentoring program. It does require experts spending time reviewing to > make sure it is correct. Are those proposed, ongoing or completed tasks ? If some are completed, could you share information about what has been produced ? > One thing we could do is creating a list documentation todo and review > which is part of our development workflow anyway. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss