Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:12:16 +1000
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.ksummit-discuss,dev.linux.lists.ksummit,dev.linux.lists.tech-board-discuss,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Dave, On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 09:34:57 +1000 Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 06:45, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 04 Jul 2020 13:02:51 -0700 Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > +The Linux kernel is a global software project, and in 2020 there was a > > > +global reckoning on race relations that caused many organizations to > > > +re-evaluate their policies and practices relative to the inclusion of > > > +people of African descent. This document describes why the 'Naming' > > > > I feel a need to point out that racial issues are wider than just > > people of African descent ... Also, others have pointed out that > > slavery is not just restricted to those of African descent. > > The racial issues are wider than that, and even wider again I'm sure, > but in 2020 this is as good a place to start as any, and the trigger > as that sentence says was in 2020, there was a reckoning about it > mainly due to people of African descent. That trigger has had flow on > effects in other countries, but I'm not sure that sentence in any way > diminishes that, it's merely an introduction to why this change is > happening now. And reading it again in the (actual) light of day, I see you are right and I misinterpreted this. > As for the non-black slavery, others have never pointed this out (I did not say "non-black") > before in 30 years of master/slave terminology? surely if white > slavery was as big a problem, they be as supportive of this, even more (nor did I say "white slavery") > so. It speaks volumes that I've never heard white slavery as a problem > once in 30 years, but now I'm hearing about it a few times, and > somehow as an excuse not to support this. I was merely referring to some of the posts in the [email protected] mailing list. Also, I made no statement about my support (or otherwise) for any of this. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl8BNwAACgkQAVBC80lX 0GzhnAgAjQB3N5aV+x1W1bH5/WwgEKcf2RvK87COk/sRZC5uYF3pYb1eqhRkf5DQ hkvx3PD+AaTWAm1aADbqHiCuqX4lwr84yGyPmSKQD59yX3sX1YTv0Es3PsdYUmTJ hx6d+oaUdg7wdP5plhYLtu3ywPgP4jNQQ/h822JUkyBYngjKylvbpwUQOiR9bpNS n50BKQRU4zcRFO51B0toKLCJtCwn/FWz0UHUEqurp9sdFcsNCgLA/XVbRHhbgVgc kkv7ZkriIWb/ENiu91yDDq8lHfKHFBp0sQZGy7nm08JtpEdwCxRLTSwHF0P8e5hH EqeOc77j8/zBdGjCL3v46WZJai8FHQ== =oAjh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----