Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Daniel Palmer <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:13:21 +0900
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.ksummit-discuss,dev.linux.lists.ksummit,dev.linux.lists.tech-board-discuss,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFr9PXnr0R71_o_0-Xmw0tcN9UUTMu1ahgp3ig5kE0LG=6N5WA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Willy, On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 13:55, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm personally thinking that for a non-native speaker it's already > difficult to find the best term to describe something, I'm a nobody in the kernel world but this point made me think. I'm a native English speaker but I don't live in an English speaking place and my experience is that a lot of technology terms have been directly imported from English into the local language almost as-is. In my case master/slave have been directly transliterated into Japanese as masuta and sureebu and exists like that in technical documentation for example: https://www.analog.com/jp/analog-dialogue/articles/introduction-to-spi-interface.html# I can imagine that by changing terminology that has been in use for so long that it's been imported into other languages directly or is common enough that non-native speakers know what it means might have exactly the opposite result by excluding people that aren't native English speakers and can't decode synonyms that are obvious to a native speaker. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss