Re: [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into original patch
Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:58:49 +0300
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.ksummit-discuss,dev.linux.lists.ksummit,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20201209075849.GD2767@kadam> |
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:01:49PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 16:34 -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > If not "Adjusted-by", what about "Tweaked-by", "Helped-by", > > "Corrected-by"? > > Improved-by: / Enhanced-by: / Revisions-by: > I don't think we should give any credit for improvements or enhancements, only for fixes. Complaining about style is its own reward. Having to redo a patch is already a huge headache. Normally, I already considered the reviewer's prefered style and decided I didn't like it. Then to make me redo the patch in an ugly style and say thankyou on top of that??? Forget about it. Plus, as a reviewer I hate reviewing patches over and over. I've argued for years that we should have a Fixes-from: tag. The zero day bot is already encouraging people to add Reported-by tags for this and a lot of people do. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss