Re: [lttng-dev] [PATCH 04/11] urcu/arch/generic: Use atomic builtins if configured

Olivier Dion via lttng-dev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.lttng.lists.lttng-dev
Organization EfficiOS
Message-ID <877crwmi54.fsf@laura>
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023, "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 04:17:11PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:
>>  #ifndef cmm_mb
>>  #define cmm_mb()    __sync_synchronize()
>
> Just out of curiosity, why not also implement cmm_mb() in terms of
> __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)?  (Or is that a later patch?)

IIRC, Mathieu and I agree that the definition of a thread fence -- acts
as a synchronization fence between threads -- is too weak for what we
want here.  For example, with I/O devices.

Although __sync_synchronize() is probably an alias for a SEQ_CST thread
fence, its definition -- issues a full memory barrier -- is stronger.

We do not want to rely on this assumption (alias) and prefer to rely on
the documented definition instead.

-- 
Olivier Dion
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.