Re: [lttng-dev] Discarded events
Erica Bugden via lttng-dev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.lttng.lists.lttng-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2023-08-13 10:58, Bala Gundeboina via lttng-dev wrote: > Hi, > > I am Using LTTng in my project , I am recording a kernel session for > long duration (eg more than 15minutes) I am enabling all the events for > recording but some events discarding after stopping the session, if i > run more than 5 minutes only some events are discarding. I have tried to > change in the .ltttngrc file also to increase buffer-size. > > lttng destroy > Destroying session `my-kernel-session`... > Session `my-kernel-session` destroyed > Warning: 94424667 events were discarded, please refer to the > documentation on channel configuration > Hello Bala, Based on my understanding of the scenario, discarded events are to be expected. Rather than trying to avoid discarded events, I would recommend adjusting how much data is being collected. In most tracing use cases, it is not relevant to enable all kernel tracepoints for a long period of time (e.g. several minutes) as it can quickly generate an enormous amount of noisy data that is nearly impossible to sort through. As a reference, a busy 8 core machine could generate 100 MB/s of data. Typically when trying to understand a problem in detail with tracing, you would start with a very small number of tracepoints enabled for a longer period of time (with the goal of developing a high-level understanding of when/where the problem is happening). Then as you iteratively narrow down when/where the problem happens you can gradually increase the number of relevant tracepoints without being overwhelmed with data. A general rule of thumb is that if you're storing trace data for a long period of time (e.g. more than a minute) then very few tracepoints should be enabled (e.g. 2-5). Maximum tracing detail would typically only be used to trace for a couple seconds (or ideally less if you can automate starting and stopping tracing). Here are some general references about tracing strategy: - Whether tracing is the appropriate approach: https://github.com/tuxology/tracevizlab/tree/master/labs/001-what-is-tracing#when-to-trace - Iterative investigation, selecting tracepoints: https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/documentation/howto/debugging/debug-steps (Recommended sections: Isolate the source, Trace detail) Hope this helps! Best, Erica > actually when i am running below command i am getting below warning i am > thinking this is the issue because sometimes this warning is not coming > that i didn't seen discarded events. how to overcome this problem can > you provide some detailed > lttng-sessiond --daemonize > Warning: Failed to produce a random seed using getrandom(), falling back > to pseudo-random device seed generation which will block until its pool > is initialized: Failed to get true random data using getre > At first glance, this error seems unrelated to whether or not events are discarded. > Thanks & Regards > Bala Gundeboina > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential > and is the property of the KPIT Technologies Ltd. It is intended only > for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain copy, > disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you > receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and > delete all copies of this message. KPIT Technologies Ltd. does not > accept any liability for virus infected mails. > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev