Re: [lustre-devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: Direct Modification of Lustre Metadata on Disk
Saisha Kamat via lustre-devel <[email protected]> Sun, 4 Feb 2024 12:34:36 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.lustre.lists.lustre-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACyzrcQ6iaPE0_BxPRZTBZLrZD_WvunmawVnvvQkwBVjm9mu3w@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you for the clarification. I am proceeding to check the CFS_FAIL_CHECK(). On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:59 PM Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> wrote: > You cannot use debugfs to modify a mounted filesystem, no differently than > you cannot replace the tire on your car while you are driving it on the > highway... > > If you want to inject corruption into the filesystem while it is mounted > (without corrupting the whole filesystem), you could use "CFS_FAIL_CHECK()" > to add fault injection points directly into the code, as is done by LFSCK > to create specific corruptions and then repair them (see > lustre/tests/sanity-lfsck.sh). > > Cheers, Andreas > > > On Jan 31, 2024, at 18:41, Saisha Kamat via lustre-devel < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Artem, > > I apologize for the delay in my response. I also want to thank you for > the suggestion. > However, our objective is to inject modifications while Lustre is > mounted, specifically targeting xattr faults such as LMA, Linkea, and > Lovea. Could you please advise on which debugfs utility I can use for > this purpose? > > We would greatly appreciate your guidance and clarity on these matters. > > Thanks and Regards, > Saisha > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:24 PM Blagodarenko Artem > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [Caution: Email from External Sender. Do not click or open links or > attachments unless you know this sender.] > > > Hi Saisha, > > > > Thanks for your interest in Lustre FS and research efforts. > > Regarding your question. Had MDS been mounted when there was the xattre > direct modification attempt? > > If yes, then xattr data consistency is not guaranteed. > > If it is possible, unmount MDS, make modifications, and mount it back. > > > > If MDS backend is LDISKFS, after unmounting MDS, you can mount it as > > > > Mount -t ldiskfs <path_to_dev> <mount_point> and modify any file. > > There is also debugfs utility which allows perform many useful > modifications without mounting. > > > > Best regards, > > Artem Blagodarenko > > > > Best rega > > From: lustre-devel [email protected] on behalf of > Saisha Kamat via lustre-devel [email protected] > Date: Friday, 26 January 2024 at 19:58 > To: [email protected] [email protected] > Subject: [lustre-devel] Direct Modification of Lustre Metadata on Disk > > Hello, > > I am a Ph.D. student at UNC-Charlotte, focusing on research related to > the Lustre File System. As part of my project, I am investigating > scenarios involving the direct modification of xattr metadata on the > Lustre disk, without unmounting the Lustre servers. > > To achieve this, I have attempted to open the MDS (Metadata Server) > disk partition as a file descriptor, locate the target file and its > xattr, and write a faulty value. However, I have encountered an > unexpected issue where my changes appear to be saved to memory and are > not being synchronized with the disk. > After completing the write operation, when I read the same xattr > again, it reflects the corrupted value. Strangely, when using the > "getfattr" command, the original, correct value is displayed. This > discrepancy has raised doubts about whether Lustre permits direct > modifications to its metadata on the disk. > Furthermore, I observed that even after unmounting and remounting the > Lustre file system, the xattr continues to display the corrupted value > upon reading, whereas "getfattr" still returns the original, correct > value. > > Please help me understand whether Lustre allows direct modifications > to its metadata on the disk and if there are any inherent limitations > or considerations that I should be aware of. > Additionally, any recommendations or alternative approaches for > simulating faulty conditions for testing purposes would be highly > valuable to my research. > > Thanks and Regards, > Saisha > _______________________________________________ > lustre-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org > > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Lustre Principal Architect > Whamcloud > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ lustre-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org