Re: [lustre-devel] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] [DRAFT] Lustre client upstreaming

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> 
> Don't get me wrong, it's not that I *want* to maintain ldiskfs forever
> out of tree,
> but pretty much every patch we try to upstream to ext4 is rejected for
> one
> reason or another, so I've stopped holding my breath that this will
> move forward.

This might be a useful subtopic to raise at LSF if an invite is
obtained. A succinct list of the needs and approaches would be useful to
whoever tries to lead the discussion.
There are 50 EXPORT_SYMBOLs added to ext4.  Maybe grouping and
explaining those might be a good place to start.
I don't suppose there is a document already somewhere that explains the
extension in ldiskfs?

Thanks,
NeilBrown
_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org