[lustre-devel] [PATCH 17/33] lnet: libcfs: Remove unsed LASSERT_ATOMIC_* macros

From: Arshad Hussain <[email protected]>

This is the first up series of patchs which
replaces atomic_t with refcount_t

This patch removes unused LASSERT_ATOMIC_* macros.
There are still:
        LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT
        LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LT
        LASSERT_ATOMIC_ZERO
        LASSERT_ATOMIC_POS

macros being used which will be subsequently removed
in following patches. This helps in breaking up patch
logically as changes are large.

WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16796
Lustre-commit: f875d0c714b548553 ("LU-16796 libcfs: Remove unsed LASSERT_ATOMIC_* macros")
Signed-off-by: Arshad Hussain <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/50870
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h | 44 ---------------------------
 1 file changed, 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h b/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
index 378c2a56ed67..86d135a65d81 100644
--- a/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
+++ b/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
@@ -112,26 +112,10 @@ int libcfs_debug_mark_buffer(const char *text);
 #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v)			\
 	LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
 
-/** assert value of @a is unequal to @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v)		\
-	LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
-
-/** assert value of @a is little than @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v)		\
-	LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
-
-/** assert value of @a is little/equal to @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v)		\
-	LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
-
 /** assert value of @a is great than @v */
 #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v)		\
 	LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
 
-/** assert value of @a is great/equal to @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v)		\
-	LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
-
 /** assert value of @a is great than @v1 and little than @v2 */
 #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LT(a, v1, v2)				\
 do {								\
@@ -139,39 +123,11 @@ do {								\
 	LASSERTF(__v > v1 && __v < v2, "value: %d\n", __v);	\
 } while (0)
 
-/** assert value of @a is great than @v1 and little/equal to @v2 */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LE(a, v1, v2)				\
-do {								\
-	int __v = atomic_read(a);				\
-	LASSERTF(__v > v1 && __v <= v2, "value: %d\n", __v);    \
-} while (0)
-
-/** assert value of @a is great/equal to @v1 and little than @v2 */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE_LT(a, v1, v2)				\
-do {								\
-	int __v = atomic_read(a);				\
-	LASSERTF(__v >= v1 && __v < v2, "value: %d\n", __v);    \
-} while (0)
-
-/** assert value of @a is great/equal to @v1 and little/equal to @v2 */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE_LE(a, v1, v2)				\
-do {								\
-	int __v = atomic_read(a);				\
-	LASSERTF(__v >= v1 && __v <= v2, "value: %d\n", __v);   \
-} while (0)
-
 #else /* !LASSERT_ATOMIC_ENABLED */
 
 #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v)		do {} while (0)
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v)		do {} while (0)
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v)		do {} while (0)
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v)		do {} while (0)
 #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v)		do {} while (0)
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v)		do {} while (0)
 #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LT(a, v1, v2)	do {} while (0)
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LE(a, v1, v2)	do {} while (0)
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE_LT(a, v1, v2)	do {} while (0)
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE_LE(a, v1, v2)	do {} while (0)
 
 #endif /* LASSERT_ATOMIC_ENABLED */
 
-- 
2.39.3

_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org