[mlmmj] Suggestion: a tunable that allows for moderation of individual email addresses, instead of t
webmaster <[email protected]> Fri, 07 Aug 2020 18:21:32 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.mlmmj.mlmmj |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the help back in June, with adjusting my "delimiter" tunable to enable moderation of a list. Now that I've been moderation for awhile, this questions arises: Is there a way to moderate individual email addresses instead of the entire list? I haven't seen anything in the docs, but I can imagine a tunable file that contains emails from the list that require moderation. I assume I'm not the first person to consider this, as it seems there could be a variety of reasons for wanting to moderate a sub-set of the list addresses instead of all of them. One example: someone is violating the rules/expectations for using a list - instead of removing them, the administrator could put them on probation for some period, and moderate their submissions to prevent further abuse of the list during the probation period. ( the current news cycle provides plenty of examples where a similar paradigm like this might be helpful! :-) Philip Thanks for the help back in June, with adjusting my "delimiter" tunable to enable moderation of a list. Now that I've been moderation for awhile, this questions arises: Is there a way to moderate individual email addresses instead of the entire list? I haven't seen anything in the docs, but I can imagine a tunable file that contains emails from the list that require moderation. I assume I'm not the first person to consider this, as it seems there could be a variety of reasons for wanting to moderate a sub-set of the list addresses instead of all of them. One example: someone is violating the rules/expectations for using a list - instead of removing them, the administrator could put them on probation for some period, and moderate their submissions to prevent further abuse of the list during the probation period. ( the current news cycle provides plenty of examples where a similar paradigm like this might be helpful! :-) Philip