Re: [mlmmj] Candidate for an 1.4.0.a1

> On 2 Dec 2022, at 15.51, Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]> wrote:

[snip good stuff]

> Open question:
> - should this still be mlmmj? (aka the continuation of the project?) if most do
>  not like the approach, I will of course fork and rename, otherwise I will be
>  happy to make it a continuation of the project.

I believe it's smack in the middle of the spirit of the project, that the maintainer of the FreeBSD mailinglists (when I started the project, I was doing it on FreeBSD), is the official maintainer of mlmmj. Both wrt. way the FreeBSD project is done, but also because these mailing lists has a lot of traffic, so the possibility of testing should be huge.

If my opinion still counts--it's a huge thumbs up from me.

Best wishes,
Mads Martin
--
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and
totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?" - A. P. J