Re: [mlmmj] Odd message truncation with 1.4.0-rc2

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 03:58:40PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Ah, yes, that would explain the truncation. Does that also explain the fact
> > that the index value remained the same?
> > 
> 
> Yes I think so, mlmmj does not receive the reponse from the SMTP server it
> expects, so it considers the delivery as failed

Great, thank you. I've built the latest master and re-enabled mlmmjopt on
those two lists. If something else comes up, I'll report it.

Best wishes,
-K