Re: [mlmmj] What do you do with Gmail accounts?

Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:30:25 -0400
Newsgroups org.mlmmj.mlmmj
Message-ID <20240311-benign-snobbish-ibex-829c20@lemur>
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 01:52:34PM +0100, Christof Thalhofer wrote:
> "Reply-To" munging destroys DKIM signatures and therefor should not be a
> separate tunable. But there are situations where I would like to use it.
> 
> Because of that I come to the conclusion: What should be done in a future
> version of Mlmmj is to fix the 'delheaders' tunable.
> 
> IMO 'delheaders' in the current state is impossible to use right

We're using it across hundreds of mailing lists, delivering millions of
messages daily, so this statement is incorrect.

> because if
> set it not only deletes the header I want but also does that:
> 
> '"From " and "Return-Path:" are deleted no matter what.'

I have previously explained why this is the correct course of action:
https://lore.kernel.org/mlmmj/20240305-tricky-crouching-shellfish-eb7c96@meerkat/

You may be confusing "From " (envelope-from) and "From:" (the cosmetic
header). They are not the same thing and the distinction is crucial to
understanding why mlmmj does the right thing.

> as it is stated the documentation.
> 
> Additionally it rewrites the message body and inserts something like that
> (in the body!???), this is the head of the body of a testmail I sent to our
> mailinglist:

I think you may have an extra blank line in your customheaders tunable.

-K