Re: [mlmmj] Roadmap for 1.5

Kent <[email protected]> Sun, 5 May 2024 09:39:05 +1200
Newsgroups org.mlmmj.mlmmj
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Baptiste,

With the enforcement of SPF / DKIM / DMARC,  acting as a mailing list =
where senders aren't on the same mail server as you host is problematic =
for mailing lists where you are essentially forwarding/sending email on =
behalf of someone on another domain.

I raised this issue on this mailing list recently and you replied that =
it's semi possible when using 1.4.1, but would need to configure =
something before mlmmj like rspamd.

I appreciate that From-munging is a horrible workaround (I personally =
don't like it either) - but this is the approach that Google takes with =
their mailing lists and it's the only workaround I've identified that =
works if the senders SPF / DKIM / Dmarc records for their domain are set =
to reject email from other domains.


Do you think this is something you could add to mlmmj in 1.5 ?

I'm thinking this would be a 'frommungle' file flag.  And when present, =
automatically:
- replaces the 'FROM' with the from specified within the file.
- strips any of the original senders headers that are part of the =
original senders SPF / DMARC / DKIM checks.
- perhaps adds a X-Original-=46rom header with the original senders =
email address.



Cheers
Kent



> On 4 May 2024, at 2:39=E2=80=AFAM, Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hello everyone,
>=20
> Now that mlmmj 1.4 seems to have properly settle, I would like to =
propose a roadmap for mlmmj 1.5,
> please find here:
>=20
> =
https://codeberg.org/mlmmj/mlmmj/issues?type=3Dall&sort=3D&state=3Dopen&la=
bels=3D&milestone=3D4774&project=3D0&assignee=3D0&poster=3D0=20
>=20
> The list of tasks I plan to do before releasing mlmmj 1.5.0
>=20
> Do not hesitate to comment, discuss and propose other tasks.
>=20
> Basically 1.4 was mostly: modernize the code base (this is not =
finished, but advanced enough) and provide a test suite. for 1.5 I plan =
to cleanup features which in my opinion do not make sense anymore =
because they break fields used for DKIM signatures and implement the =
feature that has been requested by people here over the last year.
>=20
> I have no ETA for 1.5.0 it will be released when it will be released.
>=20
> Extra note, I would really love to get access to mlmmj.org to fix the =
mailing list with dkim and to be able to update the website or point it =
to codeberg.
>=20
> Best regards,
> Bapt
>=20
>=20