Re: [mlmmj] Roadmap for 1.5
Kent <[email protected]> Sun, 5 May 2024 09:39:05 +1200
| Newsgroups | org.mlmmj.mlmmj |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Baptiste, With the enforcement of SPF / DKIM / DMARC, acting as a mailing list = where senders aren't on the same mail server as you host is problematic = for mailing lists where you are essentially forwarding/sending email on = behalf of someone on another domain. I raised this issue on this mailing list recently and you replied that = it's semi possible when using 1.4.1, but would need to configure = something before mlmmj like rspamd. I appreciate that From-munging is a horrible workaround (I personally = don't like it either) - but this is the approach that Google takes with = their mailing lists and it's the only workaround I've identified that = works if the senders SPF / DKIM / Dmarc records for their domain are set = to reject email from other domains. Do you think this is something you could add to mlmmj in 1.5 ? I'm thinking this would be a 'frommungle' file flag. And when present, = automatically: - replaces the 'FROM' with the from specified within the file. - strips any of the original senders headers that are part of the = original senders SPF / DMARC / DKIM checks. - perhaps adds a X-Original-=46rom header with the original senders = email address. Cheers Kent > On 4 May 2024, at 2:39=E2=80=AFAM, Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > Hello everyone, >=20 > Now that mlmmj 1.4 seems to have properly settle, I would like to = propose a roadmap for mlmmj 1.5, > please find here: >=20 > = https://codeberg.org/mlmmj/mlmmj/issues?type=3Dall&sort=3D&state=3Dopen&la= bels=3D&milestone=3D4774&project=3D0&assignee=3D0&poster=3D0=20 >=20 > The list of tasks I plan to do before releasing mlmmj 1.5.0 >=20 > Do not hesitate to comment, discuss and propose other tasks. >=20 > Basically 1.4 was mostly: modernize the code base (this is not = finished, but advanced enough) and provide a test suite. for 1.5 I plan = to cleanup features which in my opinion do not make sense anymore = because they break fields used for DKIM signatures and implement the = feature that has been requested by people here over the last year. >=20 > I have no ETA for 1.5.0 it will be released when it will be released. >=20 > Extra note, I would really love to get access to mlmmj.org to fix the = mailing list with dkim and to be able to update the website or point it = to codeberg. >=20 > Best regards, > Bapt >=20 >=20