Re: Call for testing: 2.0.0 is close to the doors

I find public-inbox a bit overkill for smaller mailing lists. And I dont lik=
e how it does threading. It also looks a bit weird to =E2=80=9Cnon-technical=
=E2=80=9D people. We host quite a few of those for non-profits.=20
- jm

> On 30. Mar 2026, at 20:35, Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]> wrote:=

>=20
> =EF=BB=BFOn Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 04:14:05AM +0200, Jona M=C3=BCller wrote:=

>> Hello Ron,
>>=20
>> Chris recommendend your archiver to me and I really like the idea. The
>> pipermail-style output is a lot less clunky and much faster than the mode=
rn
>> replacements. Especially for threads.=20
>=20
> As another data point, public-inbox works well with mlmmj. E.g. see:
> https://lore.kernel.org/mlmmj/ :)
>=20
> Cheers,
> -K