Re: Adding "no-ack" flag to the radiotap flags
Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.netbsd.radiotap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I suggest adding > #define IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_F_NOACK 0x40 > so an application can define that it is not interested in > an ACK for the frame and the card should not bother retrying until > it received one. > When this flag is not set, the standard rules apply. > > I don't see a use-case for overriding these rules to always > _expect_ an ACK, so I think a one-bit flag is OK. I'd add it to the TX flags instead, especially seeing that the bit 0x40 is already assigned there in some BSDs. johannes
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJIWrG3AAoJEKVg1VMiehFYmc0P/0jUH/2dPXFyTaQvvwVfAclW FhD00uv1guSuzQ6pnQ/6GjXUQYQMLQRqxVSkQDmGqY4hPzQqPYvkxXiRpx78njZh LXRGjnDmXv8llcrJABSL+8gztjDDaWSfKCisbGAcNPLYR45hhlNQ4q9c11/gkq0w 5DEpgQodWZSkZhT6OLwW3oMIPyPcG4VT4qTUeyXxJ41EE1ksSgW6jvUoDM5u7Vaa 0270qiQ4ewEwDVLhKboY2hCKaBQj4/E7GC+KQCfSUjiAgXiBZ8NR7tLtfviUp2uY uxajlIGT8B2VGztSMh3kPXwE1U1ZM+vXw43yYSMrTm91SoL7JR38mskoTwL/AMEV GPQSdQLhC8bNv8lLYkRwUKY9QG78iya1I89MhNsg11Or8vanMlC4UGzZF06emMPc vJESib9Tvaplu0Db7duaF4p9nKDx30YwmAAPjzM1OymqnH0eGxuovGIPs2cX6BFl s/38N7ztAYs+1yzVsyS4gFZyHagGNETwFCr5ut5Um2xt/VFSuFMqUqNP+LoKDt2W OAurRb0xGwNtCa2YC/9eBF3ZB59N3acaKQN0S8cFLt3Sf/K0vTQyzrXJuGOF3Liu 8XYT2fDfbcIsktPJHTT25gAZGBYPN+Y0EWhczbuzfGRMhsHUfF7gXvjiXeBNeXqj YnWSjC76wLg8mO5QFfmy =G07H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----