Re: use of radiotap bit 14?

Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.netbsd.radiotap
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
> I just noticed that at least wireshark also defines two non-standard
> bits for the 'flags' field (field bit 1):
> 
> #define IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_F_BADFCS     0x40    /* does not pass FCS check */

Incidentally, the RX flags (field 14) have a flag for that too... Should
we remove that from the proposal and use this one instead so we don't
upset even more people?

johannes
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook)
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=XlqB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.