Re: [Proposal]TX flags

David Young <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.netbsd.radiotap,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:33:05AM +0200, G?bor Stefanik wrote:
> I propose the following suggested Radiotap features to be standardised:
> 
> * A new, 16-bit wide "TX flags" field (field number 15), containing
> the following flags:
>    - TX failed due to excessive retries,
>    - CTS-to-self protection,
>    - RTS/CTS-handshake,
>    - Frame shall not be ACKed ("No-ACK"), and
>    - Sequence number shall not be recalculated ("No-Seq").

Thanks.

FWIW, these assignments are compatible with NetBSD.  They appear to be
compatible with FreeBSD, too.

> If no one objects to this proposal in 7 days, I will resubmit it as a
> formal RFA, to allow eventual adoption.

Great!

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
[email protected]      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.