Re: [Proposal]TX flags
Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.netbsd.radiotap,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 02:33 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote: > - Define bit 1 (mask 0x0002) as "CTS-to-self protection", > - Define bit 2 (mask 0x0004) as "RTS/CTS handshake", Since you're defining these for injection too I think it would be useful to also define a way to _not_ use RTS or CTS, or define a way to use the default that the device would use from dot11RTSThreshold for example. Otherwise, when leaving out these bits, it wouldn't be clear whether that means "do not use, overriding default" or "use default". johannes
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJ52q8AAoJEKVg1VMiehFYzgkP/Ru5zliynmpnGgqdzU7CrWng gsxzY4zpcrLUur9wXtvnaf0IvIY2c7Y2B5hXj8RUZaapG+c+mY+GTz98nithYnTC SJWr1ES1MDWYNMrdUrNYzyFK8A7bhl92ffVSlD/qYo5cOgmfJeEPySsAaZnVvhWo cf1oU+e5xneqw25XO/Bvzaj/M/cdFILACIfKjCOB1KJ5b0SRdd9aRjGDFwTaAWkD TzUaCPPhyR8ATVDAKJlnQL+UVmB7BfNo210jO/qr39wNvIAUmR524Miv/zC8liH+ yDQ6lM5VKpLLL3NfwrpQdPi0SE/NN3kawVG9Gdmn+Exdekr9G+hpc94mW8cZXQbu ClT0L9JdPydaeRBn/BSyOodn+tlXorof/TRtHChNB1jW/qFyOfMf0pd2qJjclQka JPdSepIxFrUjDSFcjNib6smkE3ODzg9MAIsxhaR27Ctzcj6b1Ek65qdPTFgtmKel miZ+vyDmcjenvPWqe3o97VleqEFjazXhM/xKCnpSPtb4M5ZgdUUKpwtNaf3XkWzZ PDgKmI3jusXdMhsOrdhgPDyd5XQ1i2lc2Dok39FN6Ee+yZE4/AWutO503s/po6Xy PI3fNQMx7IBCxZrN9AJYNzJVaevuAlRmtygUjIWt56gBemtmq802t5XiPU9wkAhj 23CaNgIGWojcTsYM0UKK =5d6O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----