Re: MCS rate suggested field - how about aggregation
Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.netbsd.radiotap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 13:50 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Matteo added an MCS field as a suggested field: > > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS He was going to submit an RFA -- can we not jump that? :) > Curious if anyone has thought about how to process aggregates though. FWIW, I think MCS and aggregation is logically different although they both belong to HT most of the time. Therefore, I think aggregates should be handled in a different field. johannes
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLD5o/AAoJEODzc/N7+QmaMa0P/1slSOB1HQAx0ZjVTzJcDV5F ija6ceEZKUhlnuTeJ0h6Dmug/NpLwjlTcIeuNu9HzQYmGUkx8sxaJzkb3ptyITCI W2lsifDd8lqr/g0zxwKBs0x+O7skOvTNxtRkl8pKZPPM2Jc4m3cjI/bK7KdXOt/p qmWvIc45Tvt6i/pbWm3NLeCd69woLQF87WJV69UIRuw/Kvgb69s5TVebJ4iyRbar wrJoYIl272maWukR5cge0tmtekMqlWtzAmue4xaOuoe/3KFOM0uO2W2PhFqsh1hp mCRhHpkF0pWAdtD2lvigix8MvCDBvgfaPJS8+hmGrVIZBsvfAZbZZDj/c5+9itBi qdsTwbiosAdnGbv83G3GZwLnlw4YAdfU4Q/VR+Fje9JZYGNFOgho23Q0zFNmGhTf lXOSqjEEusUOlwbxoOTpjPgwvyaiETRy3uPReGagnswyfBIRTidAQX884phLjFKq C/z4UL7/btEiTPdD6Mvm8nml30Gb0f7A5j1y5qgDHA5kMmp80VahU0rf2vZPvjBo vsNiLk6raIOpLv/3X0uuVqGrFgYBw9lz0umpFNRc6HHCeUD7JOsoxoDMjXDf5YdR sxGok0f/lt8AMdh7qkLxUPUufr248x3YrtBtSoFwmJLkOMlwSBovB1301UeOcZ7r mByP84R7wWJJmUVOevjL =sbG2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----