RE: Regarding A-MPDU status field

Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.netbsd.radiotap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

> > -- it might also be helpful to know the padding length before/after
> (?) the packet for example.
> We can add
> 1) Padding length information
> a) value of padding length after the MPDU, and
> b) (debatable) total padding length before the subframe for the
> special case of preceding delimiters with MPDU length zero used to
> meet minimum MPDU start spacing requirements. All the octets of the
> preceding 'zero delimiters' together form the pad, as I understand.
> Note that this information might not be provided by some hardware.
> If an MPDU (not 'zero delimiter') is actually present prior to the
> current subframe for which radiotap info is being displayed, 1b)
> should be zero for the current subframe. Post MPDU pad length
> information for the prior MPDU would anyway be available (assuming the
> containing subframe of the prior MPDU is not corrupted).

So what I wanted here was to be able to reconstruct what happened on the
air as precisely as possible. I don't think the length of the padding is
actually needed -- it can be calculated after the fact since it is
always 0-3 bytes up to a multiple of 4. The number of zero delimiters
would be more interesting.

I'm not sure how to deal with the corruption case.

> Additionally:
> 2) A bit to indicate if this is the last subframe in the A-MPDU.
> Though there might be other ways to infer this information, having it
> as an explicit field would provide convenience. 

That seems useful, although I'm not even sure how you would even know
that it is the last one?

> 3) A bit to indicate if the Delimiter CRC is in error.

That's useful, but in that case are you even decoding the MPDU and
passing it up? Also what if a zero delimiter has a bad CRC? Or what if
it just got corrupted and you have to recover parsing? I'm not sure we
can cover all these cases.

> 4) (Debatable) Delimiter CRC value itself. I don't know if there is
> any hardware which returns the actual value to software. Anyway,
> having it as part of the field will allow platforms which do possess
> the capability, to provide this information. It may come in handy for
> some users.

That seems a bit of a stretch, but it's only 8 bits so I wouldn't mind
adding it.

johannes
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.