RE: [RFC] VHT fields

"Alwin Beukers" <alwin-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:18:25 +0000
Newsgroups org.netbsd.radiotap
Message-ID <C6E8EE2D6B3ACB4582C1249E834B306506E807@SJEXCHMB13.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Hi everyone,

Thanks for the feedback on the 802.11ac fields.

If there are no further suggestions, I would like to request the SU_VHT, MU_VHT and 
PARTIAL_AID fields to be moved to the defined-fields section and have their bit numbers
assigned. As the group ID was merged into SU_VHT, the GROUP_ID field can be dropped.

With the bit numbers assigned I can deliver the Wireshark patch for parsing these fields.

Thanks,
Alwin

> Hi everyone,
> 
> This is a proposal for adding support for 802.11ac. Four fields were added to the suggested-fields section:
> 
> http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/SU_VHT
> http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MU_VHT
> http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/GROUP_ID
> http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/PARTIAL_AID
>
> A Wireshark patch for parsing SU_VHT, GROUP_ID and PARTIAL_AID is attached.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> Alwin