Re: [RFC] 0-length PPDU reporting
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:13:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.netbsd.radiotap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 16:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > So, does anyone have anything else needed here? > > --- > title: 0-length-PPDU > categories: [suggested] > --- > Bit Number > : 26 (tentatively assigned, field data may change) > > Structure > - u8 type > > Required Alignment > : None > > Unit(s) > : none > > The presence of this field indicates that there was no PSDU in this > PPDU, > only the PHY data is valid and the radiotap header is not followed by an > 802.11 header. > > The type field indicates the type of PPDU. > > > **type value** | **meaning** | > > 0 | sounding PPDU | > > 0xff | vendor-specific | We should add here | 1 | data not captured | e.g. for multi-user frames that we weren't configured to capture, etc. johannes