Re: Proposed Tx flag: don't reorder frames

On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 04:05 +0400, Mathy Vanhoef wrote:
> To follow up on this: the only downside is that OpenBSD is using the
> TX flags identifier to report the hardware queue on which a frame was
> received.
> 
> Since Linux and NetBSD are using TX flags, and Wireshark decided to
> already accept the patch to support TX flags as well, it seems to make
> sense to let this identifier represent TX flags. Then only one
> implementation (OpenBSD) would have to be updated to match this. I'm
> assuming nobody would be against this, since there have been more than
> three weeks to discuss this, and nobody brought this up.
> 
> What's the next step? Adopt the proposal in one week if there are no
> further objections?

Sorry this took so long.

I think we need to make a proper proposal again for the whole TX flags
field, since that was never officially adopted?


> PS: Is the archive on https://lore.kernel.org/radiotap/ being updated?

Looks like no, I have asked the admins there, but didn't hear back yet.

johannes