Re: A modified, and maybe final, proposal for an S1G header for RadioTap
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Tue, 02 Feb 2021 21:59:57 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.netbsd.radiotap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Richard, Couple of (last-minute!) comments ... > Structure > : u16 known, u16 data1, u16 data2, u8 ndp_type, u8[5] ndp_data; > > Required Alignment > : 4 If you only have u16 data, what's the value of 4-byte alignment? > Is NDP indicates that this is an NDP frame, however, the content might > not be known. Should that have a note that the zero-length PSDU field should be set? But if so, should that get a new sub-type for S1G NDP? Otherwise: > > **`0x0080`** | Is NDP, which means no packet data follows this header! | this overlaps? I guess it doesn't really matter though if that overlaps. > > **`0x00C0`** | Number spatial streams: 0=1 Spatial stream, 1=2, .. > 3=4 Spatial streams | "Number of" I guess johannes