Re: use of radiotap bit 14?
Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.netbsd.radiotap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> and there are NO interpreters in tcpdump or in wireshark for any field > past 15. Let's stick with v0 until somebody objects. That's actually no longer true, wireshark interprets field 18 now :/ > I propose to add two new presence bits, 29 and 30. [...] I'm trying to capture this with examples here: http://www.radiotap.org/Discussion/Vendor-Extensions Look there in a bit. johannes
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJIWqEOAAoJEKVg1VMiehFYAHMQAIbmjRtuf2o/gVX03PXU5NVo d771aFGb+82gxGclkMC0QwmitdubdcwkBXPeARbLupTgJGZk6mIJ/V6V+A3xIE15 hEn58vxAbMXOOHSoBt+9uT+92u7SRqOEYXZhmDJ/2jjCF5DI9dvKP8tfJ7yhVo7C faR5n78lZ0zzdY9GiwRTw7smaafp2rpoojNzoP362gBeSCI2rLpbC3D/6/jRtWFa WduECbSt/HfQCUG+45AHAaNB6WIO8qxLahNSQQndzlqxDSTCVesG5hF4gn6fN2jp wdXBRnw1PETEqIMUj3sYh2a4tRqFQucUKj9qR/kfuIekIUTrh/SaKEHctxGuXhQV 1goFB8csuTY9hym1CJomb0kW/43QPj6JWbHO7UERsfadYi7V1UO544JuF68ktmYK PMDiZ6VJlg0MWb+5gT2xoxRKN1HcQXb0AI30uoT6GbZesZSdXgTzgXgLJ3oqFEG3 7fVX6OvQnEicfKtzDto5UPb3mAq3vT8koV3T8V4tek9EWI5ps+3gpngGkTXgkT3B JnrVSNqQIpKZ2pcUMzPB1ZHUO4UFUNvkFsRB6SZpJMGkLWoSfg0POIwlLYdJNQt7 PP0HB2FeDi5ph6UkdHC9SYg1brOuto8YooOLE3uYfVJkGZ5692SymYLUv0W7qQw8 29a8uHUavtPdjRVjKtUh =wPVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----